1440p vs 4k 2023. » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit.

1440p vs 4k 2023 I would only consider 60fps on a quality OLED if buying today, and even then it would be at least 120hz. Great 1440p monitor on Amazon (affiliate): https://locally. 1440p still looks great and there’s more and more games coming out with 120 fps capability/unlocked framerates so 4k isn’t worth being stuck on playing at 60 fps. 32” 4K as those are two distinctly different gaming experiences and choices. This limits 1440p compatibility on consoles when not officially supported in games. Good post here for monitors typically recommended for PS5/Xbox. In this article, we will discuss the differences between the two. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49 in 4K » ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q1A – 4k Apr 26, 2023 · Either way, regarding 1440p vs 4K for gaming monitors, there are some important points to consider. When you do play a story based game like death standing the 4070 could turn on raytracing and still deliver good FPS with DLSS. The other is the LG 27gr93u 27" 4k 144hz. Macs work fine with 4K and sub 4K, it's just people buy 4K screens, turn on 1. com/channel/HardwareUnboxedBuy relevant products And honestly, that sucks. The MSI or asus 4k 240hz 33" monitors look pretty perfect and seem to release in the next 30-60 days. 5 scaling and wonder how shitty everything looks. And so there's way more room for improvement which means that when things do improve, it's more noticeable. However, both these resolutions are good in their own way. 27 inch 1440p or 4k also good option. For reference when I played tarkov I got around 120-160 fps at 1440p with a 5800x 3D and a 3080 and dropped to 60-100 fps at 4k. For me right now it feels like: With the 1440p ultrawide i would be safe for 3 years, be able to play everything on ultra with good framerates and when 4k becomes more of a standard and more affordable, there will be more choices i can upgrade to it. When you’re done reading this post, it’ll be much easier to decide which is best for you. It's shocking the first time you see it; you kinda forget just how wide 16:9 is. While 1440p monitors have more than 1. I also have a 42” 4K 120Hz TV hooked up. Obviously using DLSS, a 4k monitor is perfectly fine for a 4080 but I wouldn't feel bad about 1440p. Jan 2, 2025 · The Facecam Pro is not only capable of producing a high-res 4K image, it’s able to output a 4K stream at 60fps. floatplane. g. While there's no perfect solution for everyone, learning about the pros and cons of each resolution can make it easier for you when you need to decide which resolution to look for. 25x and dlss performance/ultra performance with RR/PT on. However, with the higher resolution comes a higher price tag and more factors to be aware of. Go for your existing 1440p monitor and on a 6750 XT. If it's for Solidworks, I would suggest a single 32" 1440p display. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49in or Alienwaire AW3423DWF for OLED, 175hz 4K For a good list compiled by a redditor, see here for considerations and recommendations » BenQ EX2710U – 4k, 144hz, poor HDR. In terms of performance during playing games, 1440p offers much detailed content means you can get an ultimate gaming experience using 1440p. Now this is a shocker of a take - day to day use, 4k honestly feels the same as 1080p. I made the change from 1080p 240hz to 4K 144hz and 1440p 144hz. Thus, looking at it this way, a 1440p monitor should costs more expensive than a 1080p one. 1440p, also known as Quad HD (QHD), boasts a resolution of 2560×1440 pixels, amounting to a total of 3. See full list on lapseoftheshutter. 1440p/144Hz > 4k/60Hz I prefer, by far, 1440p high refresh rate than 4k and barely getting 60fps. So if upscaling is introducing soft edges, you will display them. It offers a much wider image than other traditional aspect ratios such as 16:9. for 1440p you have the new LG 27GR95QE, and the upcoming Asus variant. 5 pixels on a 4K display for ever pixel on a 1440p display. But I went from 1440p 27" to a 4k 48" TV and there is a pretty massive difference in quality, you get use to it quickly and it just seems normal after awhile. Nah 1440p is great with a 4080. I have a 6900 XT for 3440x1440p, and I get above +100fps in most titles (using optimized settings, I believe max is overrated and using a 7800x3d) Honestly with a 3080Ti, 1440p and going to 4k soon, do yourself a favor and save $50 go with 5900X. Firstly, let's look at the differences between the three common resolutions: 1080p, 1440p, and 4k. Either a very BIG 4K or go 1440p. Ill never understand people who prefer to play on 1440p Medium instead of 1080p Ultra. The difference in detail of almost everything is extremely noticeable. The jump from 1080p to 1440p was eye opening. Oct 6, 2022 · 1440p, or QHD is 5 times the resolution of 1080p full HD, but it is still beneath the 4K resolution by a long shot. The 240hz also feels very smooth. Hey man im in the same situation as you, im getting the 6750xt later this month and im still thinking about 1080p or 1440p , havent ever played on 1440p so that makes me want to try it cz people say there is a good difference, but im scared about the gpu longevity will it hold up at 1440p for the next few years, with things like FSR and setting tweaks im sure it can squeeze a lot more frames But talking about 1440p and 1080p… for me 1080p is enough but 1440p, a higher resolution might also push you into a better gaming performance. 24" would be the lowest I'd go for 1440p. On top of that, because gaming is 90% of usage -- I was losing a ton of fps for the pleasure of more clarity. The higher the resolution, the more pixels there are, and the sharper the image will be. Feb 21, 2021 · About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features NFL Sunday Ticket Press Copyright I've now had a 32" 1440p and 4K monitor. It's easier to find better HDR support, higher brightness, higher color accuracy, better ergonomics, etc if you go w Jan 27, 2023 · Are you also confused regarding 720p vs 1080p vs 1440p vs 4K vs 8K – Which should I choose? Well, then you are in the right place. Resolution is basically the number of pixels on the screen. But the difference between my monitors now 1440p vs 4K is great! Not taking into account gpu/cpu specs, I always suggest people follow this ranking for gaming experience: 4k 60hz < 1080p 144hz <<< 1440p 144hz < 4k 144hz. Conversely, you could use dldsr to get a 4K like image on a 1440p monitor, though it works better in some games than others and is 3-7% more demanding than native 4K. Dec 28, 2023 · When purchasing a security camera, we usually come across terms such as 4K, 1440P, 1080P, 720P, etc. Edit: If you have the budget, go for 4k, and 32". Go with 1440p 144hz if that's your budget. Oct 29, 2023 · 4k monitors are the king for image sharpness compared to 1080p and 1440p, which is the main advantage of those resolutions. My first screen is a 4K Dell office monitor. Consoles in best case scenario run 120 but more likely 60 for 4k and my current PC can’t handle it, I don’t really want to pony up for a 4090 so 7900xt/XTX or 4080 is more likely and that’s not going to push 4k 240 anyways I just upgraded from a 32-inch 4K 60hz VA monitor to the Gigabyte M32U and it rocks. 0 is good enough at 4K. It's really not "bad", and I seriously doubt you'll have the time to notice, frame by frame, whatever marginal differences one sees on 4K vs 1440p (assuming you have all the necessary hardware, costing as much as an OLED TV, and the cables to transmit reliably to render 4K resolution Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. Higher Hz (with fps) makes the games more responsive and cleaner image during fast movements. reReddit: Top posts of 2023 If we have say 27-28" 16:9 in both cases, then I'd go with OLED 1440p. I have both a 27in and 32in 1440p, and 1440p definitely looks better in smaller size, the dpi difference is noticeable. Oct 16, 2023 · The price difference between 1440p and 4K screens is still considerable, as 4K screens are still pretty niche. The dell g2724d 27" 1440p 165hz, this specific 1440p monitor supports VRR on ps5 where as most hdmi 2. Text can look a lot better on 4K. if thats too demanding try 1. If you plan to eventually get a 4k, your best bet is to save your money now. There is far less pixel crawl on objects like wires and characters in the distance. 27in is the sweet spot for 1440p. Should I keep the resolution at auto? (Monitor output shows its 4k in info) or should I set it to 1440p ( monitor output at 1440p in info) What produces the sharper image? Or does it not matter since the native resolution is 1440p for the monitor, and 4k images are scaled down? You can’t scale a 1440p display on a Mac. 0 displays won't. Yea for movies,videos, and TV shows…4K is better than 1440p for that. I know some other genres like shooters, most pros prefer 1080p or 1440p over 4k. since i prefer to only have 1 monitor 4k feels nice because its like having the space of 2 screens in 1. depending on your gpu youll get better results with dldsr+dlss than just dlss. Furthermore the difference between 1440p and 4K isn’t that big to be honest. And working on a huge screen also means "turn your head left-right all the time". 25x on a 27-inch screen, the pixel density of 1440p QD OLED has to look better than native 4K on a 32-inch screen, right? 4k OLED monitors are currently 42" or larger, which is an absurdly big screen for PC gaming in most setups. Also remember newer games coming will be more detailed and require even more horsepower, so fps only gets lower in that situation on 4k . That’s not really true, because a 32” 1440p monitor has the same PPI as a 24” 1080p monitor, and 24” is generally considered the upper limit for 1080p. I wouldn't do 4k on anything smaller than 32". Vs 1440p Tn 166 1440p vs 144hz 4k both are good enough in that field. 1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable: https://amzn. For 144hz, see Gigabyte 4K or LG 27GN950-B 4k OLED options are a plenty. So, purchasing a 1440p monitor with 144Hz is strongly advised if you have more money. I played on 1080p/240hz and on 1440p/144hz. I have your same setup and wouldn't think of doing 1440p or 144hz. 25x where it looks miles better. 25x more pixels Higher refresh rates have a much higher impact IMO. Since many games are locked to 60fps, I'd personally take 4K144hz over 2K240hz neem using 1440p 27'' for years, I don't think sharpness is horrible, but it's not obviously as good as 4k or smaller screen. what I am supposed to do now that native 1440p feels blurry to me? Probably keep playing at 4k DSR where possible. 1440p to 4K is not worth the fps loss. Which I think many 1440p monitors do now. most 2023/2024 games are insanely blurry at 1440p too. OLED has the benefits of IPS and VA panels without the drawbacks (ghosting/backlight bleed/glow). But even more surprised that 1440p looked nearly as good as 2160p on the monitor even though the monitor was upscaling the 1440p to 2160p. You will see more difference between 1080p->1440p that 1440p->4k. However it wouldn't be as smooth as 4k. What’s more, some 1440p and 1080p gaming monitors offer a higher refresh rate that For me it's making more sense to go 1440 because the difference vs 4k is supposedly negligible at a 2-3 foot distance, 1440p 144hz pc gaming is more accessible and cheaper that 4k 144hz both in monitor and gpu, and even if you wanted to go 4k 144hz for your ps5, you'd have to wait and spend even more money on brand spanking new hdmi 2. 1440p is where this card is best suited really. You need to either fork out for a 5K monitor or stick to 1440p. My old main monitor was 1080p 165 hz, and I didn’t know if I wanted 1440p 165hz or 1080p 240hz. Reddit . Make sure your GPU can handle the jump. Budget should not be an issue, however the 1440p monitor would most likely be 240hz whilst the 4k monitor would he 144hz. It’s much easier to achieve the smoothness of 120+fps at 1440p than it is with 4K if you want to max out graphics settings. Grrat performance and It's a good price to, goes on sale for 300. May 30, 2024 · One of the most significant factors in the 1440p vs. Games I play: Dota 2, resident evil series, gears 5 and want to buy cyberbug when its on sale. I have a 60hz 4k monitor as a secondary to my 1440p 165hz main, I like using the 4k in story heavy eye candy games, and 1440p for the rest. Both are almost same cost. 1440p looked blocky on the desktop but was a great experience in games, and ran very well. 78x. For a 4K monitor it would probably be the gigabyte M28U going for 650€ right now, for a 1440p I'd go with the LG 27GP850-B going for 400€ right now. I can't speak to those exact dimensions. Jun 22, 2023 · Bonjour,je joue depuis deja pas mal d années en 1440p et depuis quelque mois j ai refais un pc des enfer a 4500 balle equipé d une 4090je m interrogeais de la pertinence d opter pour un ecran 4k Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. Currently have lg c2 (4k 120) and 4k 240hz would be perfect for many titles I play, but if I had a 360hz I could run a different dlss setting and take advantage of it. FSR 2. 5 times as many pixels as their 1080p So I think your question is really 4k 60Hz vs 1440p 144Hz. $430 - 27” KTC M27T20 - 1440p Mini LED / 165Hz / 1000nit / 2-3ms. In my opinion, totally worth it. edit: Im going to go for the 1440p monitor, sorry for not responding to all replies I am at school. Same for Reddit, bunch of people claim 27” too small, others can easily notice. patreon. To the point where I get bummed about having to use my 1440p if my pc can’t push the game enough to play at 4k. Apr 24, 2023 · Bottom line, I'm a bit lost between 27'' vs 32'', 1440p vs 4K (at each respective size), VA vs IPS, and 60Hz vs 144/165, upgrading vs sticking with what I have. To fully enjoy 4K content, you need a powerful computer with a 4K-capable graphics card. Also watch dogs legion i know they are ubi un optimized games but in a situation like that I am I am at 1440p native for crispness rather than 4k high ppi with 50-60 fps. Don't get me wrong the 32in still looks good, the 27in just looks better. Jun 10, 2022 · So, the question is, what resolution is the best value for money for a gaming monitor in 2023: 1080p or 1440p? Now that’s a toughie, but you might just find one of the best cheap gaming monitors The difference between 1440p and 1080p is huge. Your PC can definitely push 4K144hz, so I would go that route unless you really want to get 240hz via a 1440p monitor for CSGO and other competitive shooters. 1440 Ultra Wide 34" Curved vs 4k 144HZ 27" . 21:9. A 1440p or even a 1080p screen is enough for many users for work and entertainment-related purposes. So, given the choice of say 4k medium, 1440p high, or 1080p ultra, I'll usually pick 4k medium. for non OLED there is the Gigabyte M28U, a 28" 4k monitor. . But if you got a small 1440p monitor with excellent pixel density you wont see much of a difference at all but there are very few small high resolution monitors out there made for consumers so the vast majority of people don't even come close to having this issue. But Macs themselves work fine with all screens, lol. The 4k is IPS though. Having said that, for single-player games I prioritize resolution myself, although even in this scenario a lot of people still favour the refresh rate instead. It delivers playable 4K. The smaller monitors aren't likely to release until late 2023, and expect those to be insanely expensive, like the Odyssey G8 34" QD-OLED which is almost certainly going to be >$1200. There are other things that are more standard on 4K monitors though just because they're more expensive. Best bang for the buck right now, unless the AOC 24G2 is in stock 1440p 144hz Aug 29, 2023 · The pixel dimensions of “1440p” and “4K” resolutions are as follows: 1440p: Pixel dimensions: 2560 pixels in width x 1440 pixels in height; Aspect ratio: 16:9; 4K: Pixel dimensions (UHD): 3840 pixels in width x 2160 pixels in height; Aspect ratio: 16:9; This resolution is also commonly known as “Ultra High Definition” (UHD) or Oct 26, 2023 · The difference between 1080p, 1440p, and 4K monitors lies primarily in the number of pixels and the refresh rate. im on an hp 4k 60hz 28inch, i mainly play games and couldnt imagine a lower resolution, the difference between 1440p and 2160p is huge. 1. That really sucks. Even if you can get good FPS on 4k today, tomorrow it will that much harder to run, and the details on 1440p is generally enough, it's a huge difference from 1080p and at 27 inch pretty much nearly Aug 17, 2023 · Thank you to Ruipro for sponsoring this video!Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2. What is 4K Resolution? 4K resolution is an image However I’m curious if you believe the competitive gaming scene is going to prefer 1080p over 4k. Through this blog, we hope to make users more aware of the importance of screen resolution so that they can make a more appropriate choice when purchasing. It's overkill for 1440p, but it won't blow you away with super high fps in 4K either. The horizontal width is more important for multitasking as vertical height is normally scrollable. But it’s barerly noticable to 20/20 vision. Not amazing, but not terrible, either. If you’re between a 27” 1440p or 34” UW then I would always recommend the ultrawide because you’re just getting more screen on either side that you otherwise wouldn’t get. If you're looking for immersion I'd go for bigger screen before considering 4K, which comes with numerous downsides like being really hard to run. The thing is, on a 4k monitor you have actual pixels displaying things. 1440p 27" is already 109 PPI, that's not amazing but it's actually a sweetspot for GPU performance, it's not insane clarity like a 4k 27" which has 150 PPI or so but it's also not a blurry But at the same time I wonder if it would be worth experiencing 4k gaming. It'd still be a larger percent increase between 4K and 1440p (~45%) at 27" vs 1440p and 1080p (~37%) at 27", but there are also diminishing returns. I paid $430 for it. I use them 90% for work, 10% for casual gaming. I have a 27inch 1440p240hz display and a RTX3080. I had a 4080 and a 4k monitor and I almost wish I had a 1440p monitor when trying to max out some games with Ray Tracing. 4k monitors can still be versatile if you need something for gaming and office work, but they cost more than 1440p monitors, so only go for these over 1440p displays if your budget allows for it. I'd call it an entry level 4K card. It’s noticeable but not comparable to the difference between 1080p and 1440p. Then I don't think you need a 1440p monitor. Why do you think you can’t see that? Have you ever put a 4k monitor and a 1440p monitor side by side? Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. 7 million pixels. I have a 4k monitor and a 1440p monitor side by side. The 1440p has higher ppi but the 4k display is higher res so not sure in the above Please and thanks The Game Awards 2023 youtube upvotes Nov 8, 2023 · On Xbox Series X and PlayStation 5 consoles, 4K and 1440p support depends on the display connection. But no scaling involved, so max performance. I ended up spending extra for the omen 27qs, which is 1440p 240hz monitor, I thought the upgrade to 1440p would be minimal, but it is actually game changing. I started with a GTX 970, which was a 1080p champ. I imagine you will be playing games at mostly ultra-high settings with this rig so you will be more than 90% GPU bound anyway, a potential few % difference in performance in some CPU bound titles (if cache benefits them at all and not cores/frequencies) doesn't justify the price different. Working on medium-size 4K screen will make you squint your eyes all the time. you have plentiful of VRAM. sure you can use DLDSR but why the hassle at that point. Apple also phased out sub-pixel AA, so things look worse than they did 3-4 years ago. Sep 24, 2024 · A 1440p monitor offers a vivid image quality that’s not as power-hungry as 4K. Sep 11, 2023 · Because 4K has more than double the pixels of a 1440p monitor – 125% more in fact – a 4K monitor is considerably harder to drive than a 1440p display. You also gotta take into account monitor cost, a 4k 144hz monitor is around 500$ on the cheaper end. link/yRvkGreat 4K monitor on Amazon (affiliate): https://locally. But many 1440p monitors lack HDMI ports, instead using DisplayPort connections. Dual screens in Solidworks can work, but I went from a pair of 27" 1440p displays to a single 43" 4k display with Windows set to 150% scaling and I love it. High fps is so much better than 4k. 4K xess performance will often look better than native 1440p Something to consider is that for the super intense RT graphics stuff, a 4070ti @ 1440p is faster than a 4090 @ 4k - even if you have the deepest pockets you lose some performance going 4k. For those two things, 1440p is probably fine. Spread the loveAs we all know, the resolution of a monitor or display plays a vital role in the viewing experience. 1440p 144hz » LG27GP850-B - IPS, - Reddit favorite mid-range monitor. Support us on Patreon: https://www. Especially for older games which are 1080p upscaled ones. to/432NDGSGet access to all my ICC profiles & Jul 9, 2024 · Why does 1440p look better than 4K? 1440p ultrawide vs 4k: The 1440p looks better than 4k because of its aspect ratio i. List last updated July 2023. I've recently bought a second screen. In 95% of cases, AA is good at 1440p AND even 4k. us/du8fJ📽️ https://yo For programming, assuming you can use only one monitor, best monitor in my view is Dell U2520D, a 25 inch 1440p. All I can do is to suggest based on my experience, and that experience says that 4k looks much better. , which not only represent different screen resolutions, but also have other differences. 32" is too nig for me. Welcome! For PC's and general gaming, here are the most frequently recommended taken from reddit posts. 1440p vs. I would go 4k for 32in+ monitors. for 4k, you have Asus PG42UQ, LG C2 42", (no 32" 4k OLED at the present time). $430 - 28” Gigabyte M28U - 4K IPS / 144Hz / 300nit / 2ms I’m leaning towards the KTC because I have a 32” 4k monitor at work that is 300nit and the lack of brightness and color depth bugs me. As someone who got a 4k montior instead of a 1440p, I would say generally don't go for 4k unless you have a productivity usecase for the 4k screen. Go for 4K if you truly want to see how games are meant to be seen (as in how they appear on trailers most often). The price of the 1440p monitor is still significantly higher even though it only has 144Hz refresh rate, whereas the 1080p monitor has a higher refresh rate of 240Hz. There are many resolution comparison videos on YouTube. I’d much prefer 1440p 120fps vs 4k 70 fps. link/Z9KZProducts provided by Gig Feb 4, 2023 · 1440p vs 4K: どっちがいい? 仕事に適した機器があれば、技術に精通しているかどうかは問題ではありません。 ハードウェアがソフトウェアと互換性がない場合、遅延、予期しない速度低下、アプリのクラッシュなどが発生する可能性があります。 While many games support a 4k resolution and it will look better than 1440p, the difference isn’t really worth sacrificing a high refresh rate. My experience using a 3060ti on a 4k TV is that I nearly always find games look better at native 4k, with reduced quality settings, than at 1080p or 1440p with higher quality settings. man, I have been playing CS2/NFS Heat/COD MW 2019, I think at best on 1440p (Ryzen 7 5700X + Nvidia 4070). 1440p to 4k is a significant jump in clarity but to me it doesn't "feel" as big of a jump as 1080p to 1440p or at least doesn't feel worth it a lot of the time when you take the bigger performance hit into account. Should you get a 1080p, 1440p or a 4k gaming monitor?1440p monitors I recommend in 2024 (affiliate links):Dell G2724D: 🛒 https://geni. The better comparison is 1440p UW vs. Is it worth to buy a 4k monitor for ps5? Now I have a 27" 1440p monitor but I am thinking about changing it to a 4k 27". After hearing time and again that 1440p is a sweet spot for gaming and thinking it would still give me enough picture clarity, I picked the 1440p LG 27GP850 as a second monitor. Alot of the new games and Sony exclusives have vrr and can play up to 120hz, it's 4k 120hz, but games destiny 2 are actually 1440p 120hz crucibles but checkerboard (upscaled at 4k) so ye it can do it, but majority of games are 4k 60hz. I could have gone dual 32" but this thing is huge. Best combo of performance and value. With technological advancements, gaming has become more 1440p vs 4k debate is moot depending on PPI. To be fair at the beginning it didn’t felt as smooth as i was used to, but after a couple of days, 144hz became the standard and it was plenty enough. Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » MSI OPTIX 341CQR - VA, great budget option for a gaming ultrawide. Like I said, the 6700 xt is a beat meager for 1440p, but you are on 1440p ultrawide, which is even more demanding. I have a 27 1080p but, I only plan to upgrade to 1440p when I upgrade my 2060S in mid 2023. I also use a 4k tv in the living room and tbh 4k looks better for ps5. I personally don't see a reason to invest in a high refresh rate 4k monitor still, they're only gonna get better in a year or so from now, and so will hardware. Resolution 1440p or QHD (Quad High Definition) has a resolution of 2560 x 1440p doesn't scale perfectly to 4K, so you'll get 1. Thoughts? Lets talk computer screens! 4K vs. 24 Apr 2023 at 17:41 #2 4k or 1440p, which one should i get, I will mainly play games like RD2, dying light, etc, but I also wamt to play games with my friends like fortnite, minecraft and csgo, i'm planning on buying the rtx 4070ti super and pair it with an i5 12600k, so that being said, which one is my best bet. there isnt a massive performance difference between 1. com Feb 18, 2022 · 1440p vs 4k is a common question that consumers face, so let’s take a look at the differences between these two resolutions. The bigger jump in technology will be going to an OLED. Contrast is ok. Some games I play at 1440p and others I play at 4K (through DSR). com/hardwareunboxedJoin us on Floatplane: https://www. Two popular resolution options are 1440p and 4K. It all depends on monitor size, though. I mainly play fast FPS games, if I had to choose one display to live with it would be the 1440p 240Hz. Mar 9, 2023 · Finally, there is a difference in hardware requirements. If you’re going with 4K then I wouldn’t go smaller that 32 inches as you aren’t really getting the benefits of 4K at 27 inches in my opinion. » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. For a console that means games are likely to run at just 30FPS, maybe 60FPS at an absolute push, whereas at 1440p they are often capable of 120Hz. In the end, is the better picture quality worth your money? You will find out in this expert review of 1440p VS 4K. If I were to get a 4090, would my hypothetical monitor be a 32-inch 4K or a 27-inch QD OLED 1440p? Obviously, the ideal goal is a 32-inch 4K OLED at 144Hz, but its not available right now! For me, with DLSSR at 2. get a 4k screen and enjoy it. Basically becouse pixel density, on a 24" or 27" monitor there is not much difference between 2k and 4k, the larger the monitor or TV the more noticable the differece On another note, if your 1440p monitor is capable of taking 4k signal and downscaling it to its native resolution, definitely try that out because it really did look good! Not quite as good as 4k however, and also, most (if not all) 1440p monitors capable of taking a 4K signal and downscaling it CANNOT do so whilst still producing 120hz. Although. If your gpu can handle it try out 2. 0 can upscale decently at 4K from 1440p… Although I find that DLSS Quality 4K (which is upscaled from 1440p) looks definitely better than native 1440p… But you are using an AMD card and not Nvidia so don’t really worry about DLSS, FSR 2. If you won't be upgrading for several years, then 1440p might be better because 1440/100 => 1440/75 => 1440/60 is better than 4K30 => 4K<30 or non-native 1440p on a 4K monitor. The difference between 1440p and 4k is also very noticeable. Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. 240Hz looks really clean compared to 144Hz, whereas I’m shocked people can even play at 30-60Hz. 27” 1440p and 32” 4k are the sweet spots for both resolutions, so you’re not going wrong with either there. What looks better: 1440p on 1440p display or 1440p upscaled to 4k with FSR on 4k display? 4K with FSR Quality. 1440p displays, on the other hand, are more accessible and can be enjoyed on a wider range of hardware. Everyone is different, I love 4k on 27” and can clearly see the difference as night and day, while my friend can not see the difference vs 1440p. 4k is Just not worth it. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Playing on 1440p ultra for years, or playing on 4k medium. For 144hz, see Gigabyte 4K or LG 27GN950-B. Discussion I have been cycling through monitors for the last 5 years or so. If you can afford ~$400, I'd say get the best of both worlds and get one of the 28" 4k 144Hz monitors like the Gigabyte M28U, Acer Nitro XV282K KVbmipruzx and Samsung G70A (all share the same panel and perform about the same). In the context of this 1440p vs 4K comparison, 4K is playing a completely different game on its own. If you select scaling as 1440p, which makes most sense on such a display, then it'll render at 5K and downscale to 4K, which will put some load on the s Oct 16, 2023 · 4K vs 1440p en 2023 : Choisissez la meilleure résolution pour vos besoins avec notre guide comparatif axé sur la qualité d'image et les performances. I have no idea why they decided to compare a 24" 1080p to a 27" 1440p while keeping the comparison between 1440p and 4K the same size, though. Let’s find out all the k Mar 28, 2023 · 4K vs 1440p monitors in 2023 (Image via Sportskeeda) Gamers have long debated whether to opt for a 4K or a 1440p monitor for gaming. 78x dlss ultra performance and 1440p dlss performance, but theres a pretty big image quality jump when using PT/RR with dldsr on a When I used my 28" 4k I had to use windows scaling for everything because the PPI was so high. Obviously mini-LED is also varied where not all products are created anywhere near equal. e. 4k is nice but even a 3080 is going to struggle at 4k. Moving from 1440p to 1080p for my RMA wasn't that big of a shock, in fact I got used to it pretty quick. 2023 1440p vs 4k high refresh rates . If desktop use matters, then 4K wins again. I know 1440p looks much better but Im also not going to reduce ingame settings to be able to move that resolution, and Im a "midrange card every 3y-4y" kind of guy. At 27" 1440p, macOS uses non-retina rendering, and it sucks. Aug 3, 2023 · Comparing Different Resolutions: 1080p vs 1440p vs 4k. Oct 21, 2023 · 1440p vs 4K resolution, this has been in a debate for a really long time. One of the most common comparisons is between 1440p and 4k resolutions. Assuming 1440p and 4k are achieveable with a given hardware to produce the same smooth fps (e. As for why DSR 1440p -> 4K looks better than 4k -> 6K/8K, my guess would be that native 1440p looks worse than native 4k. Also, the difference in iq between native 4K vs dldsr 4K is much greater than 1440p on a native 1440p display vs 1440p on a 4K display. 27 inch is an ideal size for all except 1080p, which is only worthy of 24”. also at 4K you will be GPU bottlenecked, so getting a 7800X3D won't help your fps much. The higher the resolution, the sharper and more detailed the graphics and text will appear. I'm happy to focus primarily on higher fps 1440p with occasional 4k TV gaming (even then I find myself leaning toward 120fps 1440p over 60fps 4k). Locked 60hz with black frame insertion is tolerable on an OLED because the panel is so fast and motio At 27 inches, stick with 1440p. Whether you’re a gamer, a video editor, or simply someone who enjoys watching movies, understanding the differences between display resolutions is essential. Just curious if this is will be the case with SF6 That’s why I’m wondering if it makes more sense just to go 1440p. I have 1440p 240Hz and 1440p 144Hz monitors. In this article, we will delve into […] DLSS quality at 4k res will look better than native 1440p. 4k is just awesome, my dad has 27'' 4k and it's gorgeous, but I can't live with 60hz, even scrolling and moving window around feels choppy and no way in hell I can get used to it with my phone being 120hz as well. At 4k in a couple games it may actually run out of vram too. If it’s not, a good compromise would be a 2K screen with the possibility to upscale to full HD. Native 4k will be more detailed than DLSS quality (I've yet to see a game where native 4k is not, though some are super close to damn near look the same) but sometimes there is shimmering at native 4k which DLSS probably won't have since it uses DLAA anti aliasing. I've been thinking lately if the difference between 1440p and 4k is visually visible at 27" and what about the difference between 1440p and a 1080p panel with 1620p DLDSR active. That means you're at risk of weird colour fringing and artefacts on the display, especially if you're upscaling a lower resolution image to a higher resolution display. The bigger your monitor, the bigger the difference is going to be. At 27" 4K, macOS will render at double the scaling resolution (retina rendering) you select and downscale to 4K if necessary. In Ultrawide, you have AW3423DW/F and Samsung G85SB. I just bought a 28 inch 4k monitor myself to upgrade from 1080p and I was surprised at how much better my PC games looked at 1440p vs 1080p. Even playing games like League on 4k, I don't notice it that different from 1080p. I have a 27 inch 240Hz 1440p monitor and the 4080 is a good match. Any have tried between these 2 kind of monitors? And what was the better choice and experience I currently play on 1440 165hz curved VA panel, want something with IPS and more Aug 17, 2023 · In today’s digital age, display resolutions play a crucial role in our visual experiences. 1080p on 1080p display or 960p upscaled to 1440p with FSR on 1440p display? 1440p with FSR Quality. 120) for both resolutions, the settings for the 4k variant would of course need to be lowered in order to obtain the idential high framerate, while 1440p could run for example on ultra settings. I tried a note demanding game, rust, where I get 100-120fps. I sit further back enough to where I have about the same fov that I do with 27inch. 1440p at 27” vs 42” at 4K is the same PPI, so the image isn’t any sharper, you maybe will get less aliasing and ona OLED, better highlights due to more granural pixel level control. 4k60 monitors are likely to be lower quality productivity/business spec panels. And even downgrading in hz I didn’t notice much. It’s not easy to compare resolutions because it’s something you have to see with your own eyes. 144hz does feel really smooth even just moving the mouse around, though 4k is the bigger improvement Like I said, the 6700 xt is a beat meager for 1440p, but you are on 1440p ultrawide, which is even more demanding. From that distance 1440p uw or 1440p 27in would look any less crisp because they both are around 110ppi and that 4k c2 is around 108-109 but smaller res panels would give much higher fps and that snappiness. In practice tech like DLSS has muddied the waters for native resolution big time where running a game at the equivalent of 1440p resolution, then AI upscaled to 4K often ends up looking just as good as native 4K but with better antialiasing. When comparing similar aspect ratios, 4K has 2. 24in 1080p 144hz - » LG 24GN650-B - IPS, fast response time, 144hz, HDR10. 4K 16:9 can resolve more fine detail, 1440p ultrawide will show more view to the sides. 27" 1440p vs 4k monitors displaying 1080p YouTube videos Recently moved on from a 24" 1080p monitor onto a 27" 1440p monitor and while watching some YouTube videos today I realized that the videos don't look as crisp as on my 1080p monitor. Most 4K televisions allow 4K resolution over HDMI 2. 1440p is the sweet spot between clarity and performance. it would only really help if you were going for super high framerates at lower resolutions. Even at 27inch, there's a very noticeable difference in how sharp the image quality is and how good the textures are in terms of 1440p vs 4K. Definitely go for the 4k, there are 24” options. Only dropping to a lower resolution if VRAM is an issue. But then you go back to 1440p and realise how much blurrier it is. 4k debate is the number of pixels each resolution offers. I‘d still prefere 1080p, cause you also get more FPS when you play on 1080p. I also have a 3440x1440p 165Hz ultrawide and again the 4080 is a good match. Or if you want extra vertical space, some people at my office turn one of their 1080p monitors by 90 degrees. It’s also about fps, while it can run titles out today at 4k with playable fps. Right now I am on a dual monitor setup: 1440p/32" and 1080/27". The extra real estate on 1440p settles it for the win. IPS has its fans for the colors. Games that look bad due to AA look significantly better, metro exodus for example has very blurry look at native 1440p compared to DLDSR 2. I have a 1440p at 25”, I personally find that the UI is too small and it causes a lot of eye strain. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49 in 4K » ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q1A – 4k, 60hz, freesync, good entry level 4k gaming monitor. 32” 4k is noticeably clearer than 32” 1440p, but 4k isn’t really mandatory unless the monitor is over 32”. Whereas 1440p native will already render an image that takes the maximum amount of pixels in the output into consideration when deciding which physical pixels to use to display a "straight line". About a week to a week and a half ago I picked up a TBH 60hz vs 144hz is often the biggest difference of what you listed, at least if you actually play at high fps to match it. If we have 32" and up, then 4K mini-LED. 1080p (ultrawide?) upvotes Top posts of February 2023. I don't miss having two screens. For context, other 4K webcams max out at 4K/30fps; the Facecam Pro is the first In the past 8 years, Ive gone from 1080p to 1440p to 4K. This means that 4K displays are better suited for professionals or serious gamers who have the hardware to support them. Im mostly playing games with controller lets say witcher 3, rdr2,god of war,ac valhalla and so on.